Section R4-20-126. Written Criticism

A.      Any person may file a written criticism of an existing rule with the Board.

B.       The criticism shall clearly identify the rule and specify why the existing rule is inadequate, unduly burdensome, unreason- able, or otherwise improper.

C.      The Board shall acknowledge receipt of a criticism within 15 days and shall place the criticism in the official record for review by the Board under A.R.S. § 41-1056.

Historical Note

New Section made by final rulemaking at 11 A.A.R.

3660, effective November 15, 2005 (05-3).

Type of Approval	Statutory Authority	Overall Time- frame	Administrative Completeness Time-frame	Substantive Review Time-frame
Approval  to  Take  a  Dispensing  Optician Examination (R4-20-102)	A.R.S. § 32-1682 A.R.S. § 32-1684	90	30	60
License by Examination (R4-20-102)	A.R.S. § 32-1682 A.R.S. § 32-1684	60	30	30
License by Comity (R4-20-107)	A.R.S. § 32-1683	90	30	60
Optical Establishment License (R4-20-110)	A.R.S. § 32-1684.01	60	30	30
Optician’s License Renewal (R4-20-109)	A.R.S. § 32-1682	60	30	30
Optical Establishment License Renewal (R4-20-115)	A.R.S. § 32-1684.01	60	30	30

Historical Note

Table adopted by final rulemaking at 5 A.A.R. 418, effective January 15, 1999 (Supp. 99-1). Table amended by final rulemaking at 11 A.A.R. 3660, effective November 15, 2005 (Supp. 05-3). Amended by final rulemaking at 19 A.A.R. 584, effective May 5,

2013 (Supp. 13-1).