Section R14-1-211. Similar requiring letter of consent” -- defined  


Latest version.

All data is extracted from pdf, click here to view the pdf.

  • A proposed name may be deemed “similar requiring letter of con- sent” if:

    1.        The proposed corporate name is the “same” as, or “deceptively similar” to an existing corporate name except for a geographical designation.

    Example: Existing corporate name: JOHNSON PRODUCTS, INC.

    Proposed corporate name: JOHNSON PRODUCTS OF PHOENIX, INC.

    Similar requiring letter of consent.

    2.        The first words of a proposed corporate name are the same as the first words of an existing corporate name.

    Example: Existing corporate name: TUCSON SER- VICE, INC.

    Proposed corporate name: TUCSON SERVICE AND SUPPLY, INC.

    Similar requiring letter of consent.

    3.        Names containing a fictitious, fanciful or arbitrary word. Example: Existing corporate name: ARCO, INC. Proposed corporate name: ARCO PRODUCTION COMPANY

    Similar requiring letter of consent.

    4.        The proposed corporate name implies the entity to be an affiliate or extension of an existing corporate name. (Rule R14-1-214(A)(4))

Historical Note

Adopted effective June 21, 1982 (Supp. 82-3).